Tuesday, 29 June 2010

I fought the law...


I suspect there is a massive row coming between a Police "Service" that has been allowed to do whatever New Labour told it to do (including hiring dwarves as the above pic shows) and the coalition government which would like it to do what is best for the people of Britain.

As we all know ACPO is a private company consisting of chief Police Officers who "advise" the Government on policy and in effect, run the Police "service" to enable a "hands off" approach to policing by the Government.

It hasn't worked. Crime is at appalling levels whilst the Police chase the targets that enable ACPO to get rich and Politicians to grin. Swathes of our inner cities are no go areas as the politically correct "advisers" stay away from the controversial and hit the predictable again and again. So instead of rounding up known criminals, we have speed cameras. Instead of focusing on the 100,000 prolific criminals that cause most of the crime in this country, we have pointless knife amnesties and dwarf policemen.

The result of course is a Police Service that does anything but serve us. It is built and functions only to serve Politicians and ACPO. We watch as each and every day, OUR Police force becomes less accountable to us, the people who agree to be policed and more accountable to demented politicians anxious to develop social experiments or control dissent for failed policies.

We NEED elected Police chiefs. Brixton residents would vote for a Police Chief that took drastic measures to reduce crime in Brixton. It's the residents that have to live with it, day in , day out. But no, our Politicians, living in gated communities declare that is not necessary. What is needed is more targets without offending "the local community".

Stuff that. Free the people of Brixton from the effects of crime by allowing them to tell you what Police Force they want. They're the ones paying for it anyway. Name me one ACPO member who has to live in Brixton? They don't. They all live in thatched cottages after retiring at 50 on a full pension. No decisions taken by them will ever affect them.

Worried the people of Brixton might elect Lee Jasper or another Bernie Grant as Police cheif? Bring it on. They are the ones who will be dealing with the consequences, not you or I. If the gun culture thrives, it'll be their children being shot, not mine and it'll be their fault for not dealing with it. If it's not safe to walk the streets in Brixton because their new Police chief has decided all his officers need to be "culturally aware" and has sent them to Kingston, Jamaica, so be it.

Likewise, my local Police "service" are pretty much invisible. Crime is naturally low where I live, so I resent seeing PCSO's wandering the not mean at all streets of Braintree. Bugger off and leave us alone. I'd vote for pretty much the guy we already have. My choice after all.

If you want to improve the area you live in, you should be able to vote for whoever is going to Police it, just as you should be able to vote for who will run the schools or clean the streets. Get the right man for the job and watch it prosper.

28 comments:

Billy Blofeld said...

I'd vote for my local police to stop hanging around in pairs trying to catch people driving at 36mph and instead to use their sparse resources to catch professional criminals.

..... especially the wankers who stole our cars and those who have made repeated break in attempts in our neighbourhood.

Peperbarmi said...

Fuck the police,fuck voting,just fuck em up!!!!!!!!yeah.

Eat me!

microdave said...

That picture must be a PhotoShop job?
It's not????

F***ing 'Ell....

Mrs Skoda. said...

Or indeed the erosion of liberty? In excess of one million innocent folks DNA samples, no right to silence, the demise of trial by jury. It is not that the people are in contempt of court but that the court is held in contempt by the people.

Gawain Towler said...

Silly question, but...
Apart from Downing Street, how many of our politicians actually live in 'gated communities'?

(Word verification Rogerout - what did he do?)

Peperbarmi said...

The font of all knowledge said,

"Likewise, my local Police "service" are pretty much invisible. Crime is naturally low where I live, so I resent seeing PCSO's wandering the not mean at all streets of Braintree. Bugger off and leave us alone. I'd vote for pretty much the guy we already have. My choice after all."

Well check you out smart arse,what the fuck do you know about them cunts in Brixton ,you been round and asked em? what with your low crime an all that,bugger off yerself,fuck the police ,fuck Brixton and fuck you know it all Glibertarians.

Chew me!

Shanghai7 said...

Talking of dwarfs OH, I see the faux Ron Broxted is now posting his well worn rants as Mrs Skoda. But he was always rather slow and unsurprisingly is also a person of reduced stature.

AntiCitizenOne said...

Point sort of taken, but

"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog".

I remember my father telling me about an obviously under-height policeman handling himself rather well in a fight/arrest. Might be due to him being 2 people wide and a prop forward in his spare time...

I'm surprised a Libertarian would go for a box-ticking measure such as minimum height, especially for the police (remember peels 9 principles).

Old Holborn said...

AC1

He wasn't hired because he could do the job. He was hired because he may be able to do the job and midgets need "inclusion" as well in a socialist hell.

What next? Quadraplegic climbing instructors?

Marchamont said...

And scrap the railway police - they're neither use nor ornament.

Peperbarmi said...

An open comment to all pussy wussy Glibertarians.

The best kind of policing is a local mob with pitchforks,a kangaroo court,a guilty verdict and a length of rope,thats what keeps the cunts in line,not pussy wussy votes and cups of tea with the new establishment,greasing up their transit tubes for favours,for fucks sake you Glibs are such fucking wimps.....

Fry me!

AntiCitizenOne said...

May be able to do the job is better than disallowed from doing the job even when they could (as the box ticking cut-off on height would imply).

Of course with an elected Police Chief wasting money on unpopular PC would be fatal to a career..

circus monkey said...

Thirteen years of those troglodyte Labour wasters mean that the rot has set very deep. It'll take a lot to gouge it out!

Shanghai7 said...

Muslims and the " Blow You A Mile High Club".

The usually exciting Daily Sport had an article on "CCTV systems for airlines to tackle terrorism", for which quite rightly read "Let crack down on the Muslims again".It would appear that Muslim passengers entering the aircraft lavatory together will be watched"....Ooh matron! One envisages the demise of such venerable institutions as the "Mile High Club". The extra cost of CCTV equipment will be borne by the passengers who buy tickets. What of the muslim bro's civil rights? Under Labour the U.K had none but surely the coalition would not lie to us? Hopefully it will all be resolved before my own long distance flight next week when I journey care of the benefits agency to Magaluf in Majorca for a weeks holiday and hopefully a gay old time.

Anonymous said...

You may be interested to know that the "police" in Moss Side Manchester not far from the council estate where the black gangs of drug dealers live have put notices on lamposts saying it is not safe to use mobile phones in the area as many people have been mugged there. What a shining example of value for money along with the "human rights officer" based in the local police station, I assume he is there to check on the human rights of the scumbag arrested not the poor sod who has been robbed, beaten up you couldn't make it up now the chief constable is holding a get together of his mates from ACPO at the Lowry centre a bargain at £98 a head.

Anonymous said...

http://www.mcso.org/index.php?a=GetModule&mn=About_Mcso

I'd vote for him!

Fucked off said...

There would be less of this fucking idiocy if locals had a say in who policed them.

"... The entire gamut of inconsistent excuses are given for why Jules cannot take photos, ranging from the "fact” that it is illegal to photograph children without parental permission, through to breach of copyright and anti-social behaviour. When all that failed to move the young snapper, the police officer informed him that he was an "agitator" and a "threat under the terrorism act" for photographing a police officer – before removing his camera and frogmarching him away from witnesses and – Jules claimed - pushing him down some stairs."

He is 16 FFS!

The Met Police can go fuck themselves.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/06/29/police_photo_bother_romford/

Chris Ferguson also known as K.McEgan and Ron Broxted said...

The plod on the right looks like the one who gave me a good hiding and ripped my fishnets at a Gay pride March two years ago in Sussex.

RantinRab said...

The police 'service' we have today hold us in barely concealed contempt.

Remember, they police us only with our consent.

* The basic mission for which the police exist is to prevent crime and disorder.
* The ability of the police to perform their duties is dependent upon public approval of police actions.
* Police must secure the willing co-operation of the public in voluntary observance of the law to be able to secure and maintain the respect of the public.
* The degree of co-operation of the public that can be secured diminishes proportionately to the necessity of the use of physical force.
* Police seek and preserve public favour not by catering to public opinion but by constantly demonstrating absolute impartial service to the law.
* Police use physical force to the extent necessary to secure observance of the law or to restore order only when the exercise of persuasion, advice and warning is found to be insufficient.
* Police, at all times, should maintain a relationship with the public that gives reality to the historic tradition that the police are the public and the public are the police; the police being only members of the public who are paid to give full-time attention to duties which are incumbent on every citizen in the interests of community welfare and existence.
* Police should always direct their action strictly towards their functions and never appear to usurp the powers of the judiciary.
* The test of police efficiency is the absence of crime and disorder, not the visible evidence of police action in dealing with it.

Anonymous said...

I remember reading about that policeman a while back. He's not actually a 'dwarf' at all, just a rather short 5ft. He's a former soldier and is martial arts trained. I suspect he can do the physical side of the job ok...

Poor example I think OH.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/6983132/Britains-shortest-policeman-measuring-5ft.html

PC Cuntstubble said...

I have had bigger shits than that there fucking midget!

ACAB said...

well if you insist on binging on fucking doughnuts all fucking day that can happen. cunt.

yardarm said...

Plod are pricing themselves out of the market. Behold the rise of a cheap alternative: the community warden. Look forward to snoopers in hi vis jackets checking your wheelie bin and handing out spot fines for breaking wind in a built up area during the hours of daylight.

Ivor Bigot said...

Perhaps height isn't the best metric. I work close to a large police station, and most of the "officers" I see wandering past (through our fucking car park like they own the place) are either pasty drips or overly-chunky chicks who look like they'd last a fast five minutes at kicking-out time. The whole force is riddled with them, paper pushers and corporate monkeys, while the traditional thief-takers get whittled down year after year (there are still some left, and still command my respect).

At what point did our police start dressing head to toe in black? What the fuck happened to blue?

the beast of clerkenwell said...

be fair
In these hard times that midget could save on the cost of mirrors looking for bombs underneath cars or saving claims from regular police who put their backs out from having to bend down

caesars wife said...

In my older years , I have done much better at obeying the law and generally pleased to see a police officer and all for getting the little shits who repeatedly smash up the bus shelter , so that it rains on you , a visit from them .It may be deemed grassing but each repair costs about £600 so I prfere to call it council tax saver .

I do however have no time at all for some of the cocky young police , who use there duty time to give unique road saftey lessons to fit women or visit show rooms with subarus evo9 in and make easy stats on parking tickets .

By enlarge though still a bit of job especially crim raids and drug busts , dont know what your going to find these days on some jobs .

looks like Ken Clarks had his cigar doctered , ceratinly talking funny despite immediate cost benefit . not punishing crime or at least those who break the law having little to fear , is a bit of new one on me .
Dajangoly made some right noises on legal aid and immediate justice and a more simple law that is easy to understand , certainly might help the police to uphold the law better and the public be a little clearer on what law and order is about .

only human rights lobby to upset then !

Anonymous said...

Have a look at this:

http://julesmattsson.wordpress.com/2010/06/28/the-romford-incident/#comments

Makes you wonder just who is being 'served' there.

Anonymous said...

I think its great Avon and Somerset police have provided an up himself gobshite midget for the dwarf throwing contest after the pubs chuck out.

Ratings and Recommendations by outbrain

LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails