Sunday, 24 January 2010

Remember


Think back a while, to a country where you could say and think what you liked.

It's over.

Our police can kill citizens at will and no one will question them. They read our emails and listen to our phone calls. Millions of cameras watch our every move. Millions are enslaved in state aided poverty. Dissent is to be reported at every turn. It is your duty to spy on your fellow citizens.

Our politicians plunder our finances to gorge themselves on hard earned taxes whilst bankrupting our children. And our masters kill their political opponents at will and hide the evidence.

They are shitting in our faces. 646 of them. Shitting in our fucking faces. This cannot go on. I know some of the 646 read this blog along with numerous SpAds and wonks. Be warned. People far less twisted than me have had enough. And I really mean enough. It isd going to get VERY ugly, very soon and I will have not one ounce of pity for you and your ilk.




38 comments:

thelunaticarms said...

Nothing to hide, nothing to fear.

So of course they've buried this.

Anonymous said...

Well I wish it would get started because the wait is killing me.

Anonymous said...

I`VE BEEN WAITING A VERY LONG TIME FOR ENOCHS PROPHECY TO HAPPEN AND WE WILL WIN BACK GREAT BRITAIN
BRICKBAT47

john in cheshire said...

They may think that they can bury the information; Blair, Campbell,Hoon,Straw and the rest. They may think that they can go to their graves believing no one found out how they were instrumental in the death of an innocent man. But, just to be clear, while you are still alive - you are all murdering bastards and I hope you serve your eternity in the hell that you so stupidly don't believe in. If it was in my powers, I'd kill you all personally.

418 said...

Perhaps this data will leak out like so much other data.

kim, Cheshire. said...

You are so right about everything in your post. I agree totally - ENOUGH!!

Anonymous said...

The last 13 years has been extraordinary under this government. The things that have have happened since 1997, I never could have imagined would be possible before then.

kinbingo said...

OH used to be either funny, or highlighting a government abuse in a serious and sober manner. He is increasingly getting excitable and shrill.

He needs to go back on his medication.

Anonymous said...

I don't see what OH is making such a fuss bout it all. OH's pal Guthrum is over at looking 4a voice telljng everyone about how he wants t see crazy people who have not committed a crime locked up w/o trial. He trusts the govment to only lock up bad crazy people who are going to kill the innocent. He says thatthe MP & his mate that got attacked back in 2000 would have been protected if only the police had locked up soemone who had not committed a crime up to that point.

I know you think I am bolloxbullshjttn but go to Looking For a voice an see for yourselves. Check out the blog piece called Munir Hussein. Check the comments for that piece.

OH gives it all that wearing his funny mask but if hiss blogging mates trust old bill to lock people up without trial I think he should have a word with his bloggin mates. The russians used to call people crazy if like dr kelly they said shjt that people did not want 2 hear. That is ok with OH's pal guthrem he will take the risk.

Take 2 mins an C 4 yourslef!

AndrewWS said...

@Anonymous17:08 - bloggers are not answerable for the comments in response to their blogposts, many of which are posted by people who are either deranged or unintelligent or both.

Anonymous said...

fare play andrewws. I am deranged & me mates think I am a bit thick sometimes but in this instance the comments defending locking up nutters w/o trial are being writtin by Guthrem himself. He is the author of the blog & he writes on here sometimes so he is one of OH's bloggin mates. Yous should see what he is sayin there. If I was saying that kind of stuff I would not then go about as a mate of OH blogger big chesse.

Vladimir said...

AndrewWS and Anonymous1708: I checked out that post on Guthrum's site and I think Anonymous has a point. Guthrum (not a commenter) says that some loonies post a danger to society but cannot be arrested under UK law as they have not yet committed a crime. He says that society should be more willing to "section" them into care. Anonymous replies that this is not so very different from the old Soviet policy of classifying dissent as mental illness and taking the dissidents "into care" (psychiatric prison) so that they could not pose a "danger to society".

Anonymous argues that it's not libertarian to arrest people merely because they are deemed mentally ill, since the State controls the definition of "mentally ill". And while today it amy mean "sword-wielding homicidal maniac", tomorrow it may include "weapons expert who imagines that Saddma has no WMDs" or "masked man who asks policemen for their badge numbers". Which I think is a valid point. You only have to go on a "liberal" left-wing blog to find any number of people who believe that opposing the social democrat agenda is evidence of an unsound mind...

Richard said...

"They read our emails"

And yet I'd bet not a single person reading this blog does anything to secure the privacy of their email.

Encryption software is free, secure and easy to use. Encrypting email should be as common as sticking a letter in an envelope, if not to protect you from 'big brother' then to stop the spotty little sods at your ISP reading about your latest purchase from AnneSummers.com !

John R said...

If I take a moment and think back to the sort of conversations I had with friends (say) 10+ years ago and then compare them to what we discussed last week, the changes are amazing. The sheer anger that comes across now is astonishing.

I think OH is right. Being a reasonable sort of person, with friends who are similar, we're not the ones that are likely to be out on the street. But if we're this angry, how "ready to go" are the people who live in and with the social problems that NuLieBore have caused?

Thoughts about matches and tinderboxes spring to mind. It really won't take much to set it all off now I don't think.

jim, caerphilly said...

17:00

don't mind her, old holborn, she says that to all the boys.

nap unipart said...

17:08

people who take great pains to conceal their identities are generally obsessive control-freaks with wanky dreams of one day ruling the world.

Old Holborn said...

Name one

society is shite anyway (mad axe-murderer) said...

17:33

the 'loonies' who pose a danger to 'society' are not a problem as they make a career of annoying the law from an early age. it's the quiet one's you want to worry about, the one's you wouldn't think would say boo to a goose - they often turn out to be mad axe-murderers. the problem is that it takes a mad axe-murderer to catch a mad axe-murderer and the more mad axe-murderers we have in positions of authority the more mad citizens aspire to be mad axe-murderers. is this the kind of 'society' in which we wish to live?

mr nunu condo said...

20:46

lord nobhol

g-woman said...

19:07

yeah, let's convert our gas-boilers to burn witches - there's still plenty of socialists out there, even 'tho reserves are dwindling.

open mailbox said...

18:02

re: your latest purchase from annesummers.com

fuck knows you seem to want to tell us about it anyway.

Anonymous said...

@Vladimir: encryption software is free yes, but unfortunately neither Ann Summers nor those nice ?Russian women know how to use it. So not much point there.

It takes 2 to tango.

too much information said...

21:33

yeah, he's probably gagging to tell us what flavour the condoms are. heave-ho.

desperate dave lammy said...

23:38

could be frilly turquoise panties with dainty pink ribbons? do they look snug on you dickie?

J Demetriou said...

Bullshit are there MPs that read this blog.

Which ones? Go on, name them. If you can't I'll assume you are bullshitting as usual.

Twat.

pc fuckoff said...

23:55

i just received a somewhat concerning telephone call from trevor phillips obe - he expressed the opinion that the satirical banter directed against mr david lammy mp on this site was caged in racially offensive terms. i duly pointed out to mr phillips that, as mr lammy is very matey with president barack obama of the united states of america, and therefore the best-connected, nay most powerful politician in britain, the minister of state for higher education and intellectual property is pretty much fair game for any verbal crap flung in his direction, and i adjudged that, in truth, the comments in question fell more into the homophobic category - although not in such a decisive manner as to warrant a collar being issued. having promulgated my verdict as to whether the ball had crossed the line, mr phillips voiced his unhappiness about the prevailing situation (he himself having always aspired to becoming the biggest black bastard in the village), but determined that, considering the full cicumstances of the case, and all facts pertaining to it, he would allow these instances of exuberance to pass without recourse to legal action. mr phillips continued by proposing the view that mr lammy and mr obama were a pair of child-murdering western warlords and that, fuck words, they'd really have something to complain about if some cunt was dropping bombs on their heads wouldn't they? i explained to mr phillips that it was not my position to agree or disagree with his sentiments, but noted that, when all's said and done, lammy did seem a bit of a poof, didn't he?

now lads, try to exercize a little more caution in future - or you'll be slapped with one. evening all.

diane flabbutt (delusional old democratic dog) said...

holborn, are you sending me subliminal messages via the word verification codes you dirty old man?

and no, you cannot feel my huge bouncy tits. get lost you big sad pervo.

I Am Sleepy said...

Does this mean that they can see what gay porn I've been looking at on the free internet computer down at the local library ?

Ras Clarts. Free Tibet. Happy Diwali everyone.

diane abbott mp (so she says) said...

03:09

i object to this statement strongly. and i wish to correct it henceforff. although biguns, after one child and 98,768 funsize tins of roses chocolates, my tits are no longer bouncy, but they're make great baps for hotdogs.

desperate dave lammy mp said...

00:07

well, for one, i read this blog, and it all seems to be jolly good-natured male-cloakroom japes 'n joshing. and my pet dave also partakes.

dave cameron (best in shit show) said...

04:24

yes, contrary to popular belief, i am not obama's house-doggie, but belong, strictly speaking, to dave. giv' us a bone mister. yap yap.

Ruth said...

It's time people took the law into their own hands. We can't rely conspirators like Hutton to bring justice.

Rogerborg said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Rogerborg said...

@J Demetriou said...Bullshit are there MPs that read this blog.

Joking aside, MPs are human beings, and enjoy a good laugh as much as anyone else.

For one thing, they'll be pissing themselves (laughing) at yet another drunken threat that the revolution is just about to kick off. Fat chance: there's far more folks passionately interested in reading about Brangelina breaking up in breaking out the torches and pitchforks and storming Westminster

Remember, Remember said...

Doctor Kelly believed that Saddam had WMDs and thought this:

"The long-term threat, however, remains Iraq's development to military maturity of weapons of mass destruction - something that only regime change will avert."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2003/aug/31/huttonreport.iraq

What I want to know is WHO murdered him!

It must have been those who opposed the overthrow of Saddam.

All the evidence points in that direction.

the scientist who went down in blair's estimation said...

18:58

no-one gave a shit about dr kelly's political views (on regime change), but the government were highly embarrassed that his clinical figures for weapons of mass destruction did not tally with their claims - kelly's cautious lower estimates were undercutting and undermining government 'intelligence' data, and the more kelly sniffed around in iraq, the more he was downsizing his numbers for weapons of mass destruction.

Kinderling said...

"Asked what was in the records that made it necessary for them to be embargoed, Mr Gardiner said: ‘They’re Lord Hutton’s records not mine. You’d have to ask him.’

"He added that in his opinion Lord Hutton had embargoed the records to protect Dr Kelly’s children."

No, it is so that all the officials will be dead so they cannot be hung drawn and quartered for betraying the country.

Anonymous said...

This is worth a read...
http://www.warmwell.com/shrimpton.html

Ratings and Recommendations by outbrain

LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails