Wednesday, 2 December 2009

Greenpeace destroyed



Gerd Leipold, the outgoing leader of Greenpeace, admitted that his organization's recent claim that the Arctic Ice will disappear by 2030 was "a mistake." Greenpeace said in a July 15 press release that there will be an ice-free Arctic by 2030 because of global warming. ...


31 comments:

Anonymous said...

They are obsessed. Fucking nutjobs.They need dumping in the middle of the Saraha.
Urban11

Anonymous said...

Or even the sahara!
Urban11

Anonymous said...

Fuck Greenpeace and all the other eco-loons.

microdave said...

For once, a bit of honesty from the Beeb...

lieman, libeler, falstein and heebreich said...

as the duly appointed legal representatives of greenpeace, greencash, greenbiz and greenpolit - wholly owned subsidiaries of nwo omnicorp - it is our responsibility to inform you that we will be doing everything in our grubby, bullying power to make sure that our clients are rewarded for dishonsty and you are punished for speaking the truth.

Uranus, The Magician. said...

Interestingly, YouTube seem to have taken down the interview with Gerd Leipold, entitled Greenpeace leader admits.......................
A message "An error has occurred" appears either from the link on this site or from YouTube directly!
Hmmmmmmmmmmm.

banned said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Captain Ranty said...

I'm with Urban 11.

Dump 'em in the Rahasa.

CR.

Edgar said...

'Green' is in pieces.

OK, I know the way ...

Anonymous said...

Captain Ranty,
Ckuf fof
I'm dysle....oh shit...not very good at spelling. Not my fault. I'm a victim,who do I sue?
Urban11

Anonymous said...

Do you REALLY want to understand politics or just be part of their deadly deadly game?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VebOTc-7shU&feature=player_embedded

Anonymous said...

Lying bastards! And to think I always thought Greenpeace were the 'good guys'. Seems like they're quite happy to big up any old piece of shite if it looks a reasonable money earner.

El-Kevo said...

You're missing the point.

Jesus doesn't exist either - but the truth really doesn't matter when it comes to dogma.

You're getting all over-excited and none of this will make a bean of difference to the fact that the lefties in charge will control your consumption by reducing the size of your wheelie bin.

Socialism by the back door. Oh - the latest is that they'll be campaigning against meat eating too on the grounds of carbon emissions.

St Paul said...

In the deluge of blog comment someone blamed a typo error for this 2030 nonsense. The calculated date was 2350 but some cooling denier failed to check facts and went into print with the mistake, which became self propagating. It does not make the warmists any less wrong.

Anonymous said...

These lying cunts are not getting any of my money. It's a fucking scam and a disgrace and it'll be sabotage time if they don't fucking back off. I'm not going to stand for this eco-Fascist crap and neither are thousands of others. Their fucking choice.

Anonymous said...

I sent this petition to 10 Downing Street which was rejected.

There response

Hi,

I'm sorry to inform you that your petition has been rejected.

Your petition was classed as being in the following categories:

* Outside the remit or powers of the Prime Minister and
Government

If you wish to edit and resubmit your petition, please follow
the following link:
http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/Outlaw/BXbnXTDOmo9qBhNciLAcj8H

You have four weeks in which to do this, after which your
petition will appear in the list of rejected petitions.

Your petition reads:

We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to: 'Outlaw
climate change debate'

In view of the recent leaking of emails from the UEA clearly
stating that the public were misled on climate change issues
for political purposes any further debate on climate change
should now be outlawed.

-- the ePetitions team

Ron Broxted said...

I wish I had known this six months ago when I adopted a polar bear. I gave a whole weeks dole money to a bloke in the shopping centre. I feel real a cunt now.

Anonymous said...

@Do you REALLY want to understand politics

seen it, nice vid.

Vladimir Putin said...

I see that dear old Dr Phil Jones of the CRU has resigned, and his "peer review" chum Michael Mann is also the subject of an inquiry. Oh dear.

Lesson to all scientists: if you're going to get involved in politics, if your research is going to affect how uncountable billions are spent across the world, make sure that you have extraordinarily good evidence for every claim you make.

I am privileged to have witnessed the transition in the last few weeks: from a generally passive acceptance of AGW as truth (with a few fanatical believers) to widespread skepticism (still with the same few fanatics). And OH was the place where I first heard about it.

catastrophic MMGW is a fascist religion for gay hippies said...

OH, you've given over a bit of coverage to CRU and Climategate but there's loads of other stuff of a not overly technical nature that visitors to this site could benefit from knowing and getting very angry about.

CRU is an important cog in a international political conspiracy that, if left unchecked, will crush freedoms and liberty in a way dwarves anything that Labour or even the EU could do on their own. The political/economic ramifications of the 'low carbon' gospel are as anti-Libertarian as they come.

There's some real public service to be had from plugging it, I think.

Anonymous said...

It is important to note the difference between if the Arctic Ice Cap melts and all the other ocean based ice surrounding the Arctic and Antarctic regions in comparison to if the land-based ice were to all melt.

There is a major outcome in each case - and by pointing that outcome out, it becomes possible to disprove the theory of rising oceans due to ice-melt anywhere in the world.

Basic Science Lab 101 will prove this out.

Put some ice cubes in a glass and fill it with tap water to the brim.

Set it on the countertop and allow it to reach room temperature.

After the ice cubes have melted, go observe the water level in the glass - and instead of the ice having melted and the water coming up and over the rim, thus flooding the counter-top - the water will have instead gone DOWN BELOW THE RIM, below where the water level was previously.

Ice is in an expanded state while frozen - and when it melts, it contracts into a lower volume state.

The majority of ice in the polar regions is already locked up in water and the Northern Polar Icecap is ENTIRELY in water.

If the North Pole were to completely melt, like the ice floating in the glass of water on the countertop, the result would be a LOWERING of ocean levels.

Land based ice will fill up depressions on the land and not just flow all out to sea. And it is my understanding that the majority of ice is already found in the oceans, at the northern polar cap and along the Antarctic shelf as well as the ice shelves surrounding other land masses jutting into water in polar regions.

If this be the case, then even if all the ice in the world were to melt at once - the smaller amount of land-based ice, such as glaciers, would soak into the depressions and form lakes, soak into the water tables and not all run off into the seas.

The major amount of ice, being already in the ocean areas, would decrease in volume upon melting - and thus the net result would be a lowering, not a raising, of the sea levels around the world.

Global warming or global cooling, mandmade or natural, cyclical or sudden change - all that - irregardless - the global warmists have been LYING all along - simply because you cannot melt ice, already existing in water and result in coastlines flooding.

In fact, the effect is just the opposite.

And this may be why Greenpeace and others begin to retract statements regarding their premise of rising tides of water flooding coastal areas - since that cannot be - the effect - as the at-home science experiment will show - is entirely 100% the opposite from what is being claimed by the climate "scientists" and has been claimed since the start.

moorlandhunter said...

For FS I just hope that many of these climate fraud scammers will end up in court for their large scale fraud that has cost us billions in cash.
As a layman who studied geography and climate at A level I knew the gits were lying but trying to get my view across was like peeing in the wind but now thanks to the lies being exposed I can sit back and shout LIAR to anyone who says man is responsible for our naturally changing, dynamic climate.

Barman said...

I wrote to Sky News this morning - hypocritical cunts!

Fed up of them telling us the planet is fucked one minute because we didn't act soon enough then running ads for holidays in Malaysia or drinking Earl Grey over the Pyrenees the next.

Fuck right off!

Oh, and if I want to watch the sports news I want sports - not the sordid details of some golfer's sex life.

Cunts!

banned said...

Anon 07:44
Terry Wogan was taking the piss about the supposed problem of sea ice melting on his Radio 2 programme the other day and explained the reality ( though not so expansivly as yourself ).
He ended by chirruping " But they are scientists and would know that too, surely ! "

Terry is, of course, retiring soon and the Beeb can't touch him now.

George Monsoon said...

I have seen a lot of news articles about the CRU dotted around the internet, but not much in the mainstream TV media. Looks like the ministry of truth has farted in the face of the facts again.

Climate change has been a hoax, UK is bankrupt, we live in a Police state, Wars overseas for no reason...,. How much longer can this go on? I can never remember a time in my life where this core belief system has been so close to tumbling. Change has to be in my lifetime. I cannot wait to sit outside with my grandchildren and set fireworks off to celebrate the end of political rule.

Spartan said...

Basic Science ...release all your data, method, codes so others can repeat your conclusions/results.

AGW Science ... hide/delete your data, method, codes and continually release ever increasing doom scenarios.

Dave H said...

Just after the first gulf war, Greenpeace sent me a letter saying 'it could be fifteen years before the last of the oil-well fires is extinguished'.

The letter arrived a few days after the the last one had been. Twats.

Ron Broxted said...

I must look a complete cunt, the bloke in the shopping centre who relieved me of my weeks dole money to adopt a threatened polar bear talked me into adopting a donkey this afternoon.

Bugger said...

Love the "emotionalised" newspeak for lying

Antipholus Papps said...

The owl and the pussycat went to sea,
In a beautiful Greenpeace boat,
They sailed away,
For a year and a day,
Before being sunk by the French secret service.

The Paragnostic said...

I look at it this way:

1. AGW is probably not true.

2. Despite that, energy production is expensive and usually damaging to at least one sector of the environment.

3. I don't like spending too much on energy or killing seabirds in wind turbines or any of that shit, so I'm going to cut down on my energy use.

4. Carbon taxes / credits are just a scam by socialists and bankers to rip us all off, and I want as little to do wih that as possible.

5. Let's open up the coal mines, and make this country self sufficient in energy for the next 300 years, and screw the 'concensus' (emphasis on Con).

Ratings and Recommendations by outbrain

LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails