You can stick your CCTV, Police State, wheelie bin Stasi, DNA, WMD, “Social Cohesion”, benefits for all, guilty until proved innocent, don’t do that it’s illegal now, can’t say that, ID cards for all, where are you going, what have you been saying/doing/reading, can’t photograph that, how very dare you, golliwog banning, we know where you live, we’re watching you Soviet Utopia up your arses. Sideways.

Friday, 15 May 2009

One Million Per Cent ........ Whats that mean ?




You, yes you the good folk of Great Britain are responsible for this man being a 'Justice' Minister. The Labour voters of Dewsbury hang your heads in shame.

By the way he is intimating that if you disagree with him you might be racist

( Been to the Dolly Draper school of Politics.... whatever happened to him, or Mandelson or Prescott.... Come on give us some pearls of your wisdom)

18 Comments:

CryBaby 15 May 2009 10:55  

The Telegraph have focussed on everyone you fucking twat! Stop trying to throw in the race card you moron!

Arrogant bastard. He's fooling no-one. He needs to shut-the-fuck-up.

Rab C. Nesbitt 15 May 2009 10:58  

What a cheeky bastard. He sounds like a twat, he looks like a twat, he acts like a twat. So my guess is that he is, indeed, a twat.

Anonymous,  15 May 2009 11:02  

He mentioned "the bible" twice.
Methinks he's gonna get stoned to death by his co-religionists.
Urban11

Obnoxio The Clown 15 May 2009 11:03  

"All these expenses were claimed in the first financial year, and once I'd worked out what the rules were, they all stopped."

Dude, seriously? That's you're defence?

What a fucking tool. How did these people get to lord it over us?

The Penguin 15 May 2009 11:03  

I could not listen to it all. Shooting would be too good for this shameless trough cunt.

The Penguin

Anonymous,  15 May 2009 11:10  

Justice minister who gets a court summons for non-payment of taxes?

And expects us to pay it?

That's even beyond the NuLab "entitlement" ethos.

You really really couldn't make this stuff up.

Oh, and don't go bribing your electorate with pro0mises of a £1000 donation to good causes

Henry North London 15 May 2009 11:14  

He's stupid. Some people just are.

WV pances

They focused on you because you claimed the most dimwit.

Dave H 15 May 2009 11:25  

He represents Dewsbury, which says it all.

Karen Matthews, also a repellent crook, represents it too. Although on TV she comes across rather less aggressively.

K. MacEgan 15 May 2009 11:28  

He has an Ingerlund mug on his desk.No racist comments now...

Anonymous,  15 May 2009 11:34  

"K. MacEgan said...

He has an Ingerlund mug on his desk.No racist comments now..."

Fuck off MacEgan, you snivelling cunt...

Anonymous,  15 May 2009 11:37  

Strike one.



http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8051091.stm

AnonyBNP,  15 May 2009 11:37  

So, he's giving money to local good causes is he ?

I wonder what they might be ? Judging by his constituency (and his past pronouncements) I'm guessing those good causes will have the word 'Islamic' somewhere in their title.

I have to say though, that I am absolutely loving all of this. We couldn't *buy* this kind of poll-boosting publicity :-)

Anonymous,  15 May 2009 12:01  

he studied Business Studies at the South Bank Polytechnic...nowhere does it say that he actually gained any qualification as a result of that study. So we shouldn't really expect him to know that you can't ever have more than 100%. It amazes me how ignorant these bastards are!

Anonymous,  15 May 2009 13:59  

Clearly anyone who criticises Mr. Malik is motivated by racial hatred. That much should be obvious to anyone. In fact, anyone who has ever criticised any Muslim person for anything whatsoever is a priori a racist.

To say otherwise is to commit a thoughtcrime. And you wouldn't want to commit a thoughtcrime because then the police would have to come round and rehabilitate you.

wonderfulforhisage,  15 May 2009 14:00  

I have to say that I agree with him. He took the 'job' of MP in 2005 and there was a package of salary and benefits that went with this job that he had no part in formulating.

Assuming that he has stuck by the rules of the package offered and has claimed only that to which he is entitled, where is the problem?

It is of course disgraceful that this ridiculously generous package was on offer in the first place but you can hardly blame him for that.

It is also disgraceful in his case that the Labourgraph has included in the story the fact that his landlord has been in trouble with the law. What the hell has this to do with anything. Likewise what has the amount of the rent he pays to this landlord to do with his integrity.

This whole expenses/allowances affair has been whipped up by the press to the point where we're begining to look at risk of the horrors of mob rule. Remember the peadiatrician's house that a few years ago was vandalised by a mob who were too pig ignorant to know the difference between a paediatrician and a paedophile. Let's be careful we don't unleash a similar ignorant and mindless mob onto our democratic system.

Having said that, I say a pox on all their houses. Not for the greed they have displayed but for allowing the Country's sovereignty to be transferred to Brussels such that 75% of our laws are sourced from the EU. That's treason.

I didn't see any arrogance in Malik's TV performance. I saw the natural anger of somebody who is being wrongly accused.

Come on chaps and chapesses, let's be fair.

baconbuttyplease,  15 May 2009 15:05  

wonderful - he admitted to paying a subsidised rent to a convicted slum landlord. This was confirmed by the landlord. That's against Justice Ministry rules. He should have declared it in some registry somewhere.
But he'll be cleared of any wrongdoing and be troughing normally in a few weeks.

Roger Thornhill 15 May 2009 16:04  

Malik will donate it to the "Keep Malik in snappy suits fund".

Donate OUR MONEY to a cause of HIS CHOICE??? NO WAY!

This and his arrogance over 800 vs 730 indicates a mindset we do not want in politics.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
visit tpuc.org
Copyright © Old Holborn 2007-2008 and the respective owners whoever they may be - though it's hardly likely is it?. All rights reserved. Every single one. None of the materials provided on this web site may be used, eaten, reproduced, or transmitted, in whole or in part, in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, carrier pidgeon, osmosis, semaphore, chav txting (gr8) recording or the use of any information storage and retrieval system, papyrus, bits of old toilet paper, fag packets, carrier bags, mystic meg etc., except as provided for under fair use, without permission in writing from the publisher - me and my dog. To request such permission and for further enquiries, contact the dog using the contact form. Offer her a bone. She likes bones.

To be governed is to be watched, inspected, spied upon, directed, law-driven, numbered, regulated, enrolled, indoctrinated, preached at, controlled, checked, estimated, valued, censured, commanded, by creatures who have neither the right nor the wisdom nor the virtue to do so. To be governed is to be at every operation, at every transaction noted, registered, counted, taxed, stamped, measured, numbered, assessed, licensed, authorized, admonished, prevented, forbidden, reformed, corrected, punished. It is, under pretext of public utility, and in the name of the general interest, to be placed under contribution, drilled, fleeced, exploited, monopolized, extorted from, squeezed, hoaxed, robbed; then, at the slightest resistance, the first word of complaint, to be repressed, fined, vilified, harassed, hunted down, abused, clubbed, disarmed, bound, choked, imprisoned, judged, condemned, shot, deported, sacrificed, sold, betrayed; and to crown all, mocked, ridiculed, derided, outraged, dishonoured. That is government; that is it's justice; that is its morality.

Back to TOP