Is nothing sacred to these bastards?
Hardly a surprise is it, though. Fits right in with changing from Personnel to Human Resources, the end game of the great socialist plan, where the proles are merely farmed for their taxes in ever more obvious ways (such as speeding cameras, fines for dropping a fag end etc etc).So why not just harvest a few when you have some high up party member in need of a new heart or something as they have worn their own out through gobbling over richly at the trough?The Penguin
The cunt wouldnt want mine!
Beast, even George Best turned down your liver.
Gordo first. The drooling cocksnaffler can lead by example for once.
Mandybum needs a new ringpiece. the old one's worn out.
This has nothing to do with El Gordo's youngest having a condition that may require an organ transplant in the future - would it?
Gordon, I want your liver, with fava beans and a nice chianti. I want it now you fucking unspeakable perverted creature!
OH you really are a cunt of cuntiest order.
Old Holborn George Best was said to have declared" I spent half my fortune on booze and fast women,the rest was just wasted ".My old Mum indulged me by allowing me to watch Monty P. past my Sunday evening bedtime but, being a State Registered Nurse ( of the old school trained during The War ), she did find this particular episide upsetting.I give it about 5 years before our Stassi State start justifying the harvesting of organs firstly from 'terrorists' and 'pedophiles' followed by Eco-Terrorist Bin Crims and Climate Change Deniers.Fuck them, my campaign of suicide by fags'n'booze will triumph though, sadly, I continue to eat rather as they demand, though I always have; because I like it.
Hmm you can opt out. I can see only one problem with this, which can be easily fixed: those who choose to opt out should also be denied any transplant should they need one.There is no reason why someone selfish enough to horde their organs after death be allowed to exploit the generosity of others.
Anonymous said... Hmm you can opt out. I can see only one problem with this, which can be easily fixed: those who choose to opt out should also be denied any transplant should they need one.There is no reason why someone selfish enough to horde their organs after death be allowed to exploit the generosity of others.17 November 2008 15:41Could you use the same analogy to the welfare state? i.e. You can only caim if you have contributed. No? Didn't think so - now fuck off somewhere more appropriate, troll.
There's nothing inside me that would be of use to anyone, in fact I'd like all my raddled, pickled and ash-coated insides transferred into a worthy recipient after my death, so they can die too.I doubt the Gorgon will still be around then, unfortunately.
My organs are mine. Full stop.If I chose to donate them, that is an act of benevolence. If the state chooses to harvest them, that is an act of Totalitarianism.
Speaking of totalitarianism - are the organs of executed Chinese prisoners still offered for sale by the state? And is it correct that, because prisoners & their families have to pay for their upkeep when in prison, prisoners volunteer their own body parts? Since the EU wants to establish the death penalty again this could be something for Gordon to look into; it would certainly chime with his own totalitarian mindset.
Sorry, forgot - very few reports mention that this is live organ donation we're talking about, for example a heart which has stopped beating is no good to a recipient, Likewise, a liver or kidney which has been deprived of blood is also useless.
I wrote to the NHS Organ Donor Register in January, asking about an 'Opt Out card' & received a reply from uktransplant.nhs.uk assuring me that'Opt In' was still the current system & that 'Presumed Consent' would reqire a change to the law (as you said OH). If Gordon gets his way I shall be in the front of the queue for the 'Opt Out' card. As far as I'm concerned he can FRO if he thinks I'm going to help the Great Socialist Dream in any way whatshowever. What a cunt he is! Mad, bad & delusional.
Anonymous said... There is no reason why someone selfish enough to horde their organs after death be allowed to exploit the generosity of others.I can see why you wouldn't want to put your name on that statement!Its not a question of being selfish. The State doesn't own me, it simply has no right to presume its okay to slit me open and poke around for the good bits just because I've stopped breathing.Naturally though, you being a generous sort, have no problem with your lungs being ripped from your carcass with the leftovers flopped back in before they stitch you up tell your family to collect the 'remains'? And of course, you won't be bothered that your last moments topside were defiled so that a 40 a day health tourist from the Gambon can live another 2 or 3 years?For many, donating organs isn't a problem. It might well be something I do myself... but the moment they change to a system of presumed consent I'll opt-out. At least then if they nick a few bits my family will be able to sue and I'd have contributed something truly worthwhile.
What a revolting old ghoul Gordon is. Not content with stealing pension money, recklessly borrowing money and being a grade A liar he also wants to harvest all our wobbly bits. The term 'control freak' is simply not strong enough for such a nasty creature.
Well the state now wants your kids,your wages,your pension and now your fukin organs when you die.We really are being farmed like sheep.
Anyone for Soylent Brown? It doesn't taste very nice, it sticks in your gullet and you have irrepressible urges to watch the BBC News.
And... To be boring and practical about the subject for a minute... There isn't really a shortage of donors, over 30% of the population are already on the "consent list". According to the National Kidney Assoc, the problem is with the NHS, it simply doesn't have the infrastructure in place to transplant all the available material, so most of it "goes to waste".
Mitch...you think they'll wait?
Post a Comment